Global Warming Hoax Exposed – Secures Our Freedom & Liberty

I’ve never believed in global warming. I’ve always thought that it was a way to get an American to give up his freedom’s in favor of government control. As if the government knows much about anything except how to take from the producers and give to those who can’t produce or won’t produce. Helping those that can’t produce is an idea I’ve always been in favor of by the way. I think we can all look at the statistics of any government program and see that they are going broke, for instance social security, medicare, the post office, and so on.

The e-mails that have been brought to light from the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit prove that global warming is a political agenda and is being used to gain control of  the individual, whole populations and undermining our country’s sovereignty. The falsifying of data should be a high crime in the scientific community and should carry with it the consequence of expulsion from the group. The e-mails in the global warming article prove that these so-called scientists were falsifying data.

Our constitution guarantees our individual rights. The senate healthcare bill and the global warming agenda are ways for  politicians, who now consider themselves the elites, to control us in our everyday lives. An oligarchy is a government controlled by a few for self interest. Well I would submit to you that our government is on the verge of becoming such a thing. The senate, the house and the executive branch are riddled with self and vested interests. These polititcians are interested in their own power not in making sure our individual right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are secure for us and our children.

I have personally visited my Democratic senator’s office and spoken with a representative and voiced all of my objections to the healthcare bill, the energy bill, the stimulus package and that I would not participate in the healthcare bill if it was passed. I highly recommend that all of you do the same and get everyone on your e-mail lists, friends, neighbors, co-workers and anyone else you can to visit their senators who are in support of this bill and let them know in no uncertain terms what you think. I am not suggesting that all of you not participate in this bill if it’s passed. I cannot since it goes against everything that I believe in.

You can make a difference. Find an online petition to sign and sign it. You can and do influence everyone that you come in contact with.

We need only one Democratic senator to vote against this monstrosity of a bill but let’s get many more. Click on the link above and just start reading the bill and you will see what I mean. Our future and the future of our children and our grandchildren are depending on us.

Thanks

Tom

Freedom & Liberty In The Constitution

I’ve read Article 1 section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Get online yourself or take your copy out and read it too. It’s pretty amazing. This is the section on the powers of congress and nowhere does it state that the federal government can dictate to an idividual American how they should take care of their bodies. This is even more amazing since President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are stating that they do have this power. Maybe they are just trying to grab more power from the individual. Their actions seem to more than suggest this.

In spite of  overwhelming opposition by ordinary Americans, the president and congress appear to only listen to the unions and groups like Organizing for America, which are special interests. I thought special interests were long gone from Washington. I guess not.

But let’s get back to the constitution. Article 1, section 8 has only one spot where you might be able to make a very small case for the healthcare bill. In the first paragraph of section 8 congress has the power to provide for the general welfare of the United States. How could someone decide from this statement that the government then has the power to tell you, the individual, how you should take care of your physical being.? Well, let’s see.

Here’s the definiton of general in Webster’s New World dictionary: 1. of, for or from all, not local, special or specialized 2. of or for a whole kind etc.  3. widespread(general unrest) 4. most common, usual 5. not specific or precise 6. highest in rank(attorney general).

The healthcare bill sure wouldn’t fit in any of these definitions. The bill itself is way too specific to be included under congress’s powers. And the exact words are, “of the United States”, not of the individual.

Ah, but what if the bill just allowed small businesses across the country to band together to get health insurance as a large group. This would give each small business a much better rate and it wouldn’t violate Article 1, section 8 of the constitution. Why? Because it’s general and non- specific. Yes, but you say that welfare is also in that paragraph. What about that?

The definition of welfare is: 1 a condition of health, happiness, prosperity etc.; well-being 2 organized efforts of goverment agencies granting aid to the poor, the unemployed etc. 

Okay, we know that definition 2 was not around when the constitution was written so we’ll scratch that. That leaves definition 1. So, we have health, happiness, prosperity for all of us but in a general non-specific way. This still doesn’t allow for the massive healthcare bill. So, how could someone come up with this bill under Article 1? The only way to do this  would be  by changing the definition of one or both of these words or by purposely mis-understanding or just not understanding one or both of these words.

Read this section for yourself and make your own decision. But, please read it and get involved. Our freedom & liberty depends on it.

Tom

Is The Healthcare Bill Constitutional?

That is a great question. I have a video you should watch from the Glen Beck program on Fox news. It is very enlightening. Here’s the link; http://www.aclj.org/OnTheTv/?aP=C36C9996-9E58-44CF-A539-E6694BEFF3E5&mmType=4 Jay Sekulow from the American Center For Law & Justice, Judge Andrew Napolitano and Tim Lynch from the Cato Institute hit the nail on the head. According to Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, the powers of congress are limited. Get this section out for yourself and read it. Any words you don’t know look up in a dictionary. Congress does not have unlimited powers.

The Founding Fathers expected that the members of congress would take their oath seriously, to uphold the constitution and not pass unconstitutional legislation. If they did pass a bill that was unconstutuional then the president would, taking his oath seriously, veto the bill. If the president signed the bill the courts would then knock it down because it was unconstitional. These are the checks and balances that were created for us.

Today though our entire government is filled with politicians who have contempt for our constutution. With such contempt, by even our president, anything goes and the slick politicians and marketing executives know best. When our checks and balances fail it is up to us, the people, to rise up and apply mountains of pressure to our politicians. Don’t stop. Don’t give up. Keep talking to your representatives and senators. Be forceful and passionate but be polite. Talk to your friends and get them educated on the issues and the constitution. Our kids and grandkids are depending on you. Be an activist for our constitution.

Here’s the link for your representatives; http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt Good luck!

Tom